<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>I Hate My 9 to 5 &#187; citibank</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ihatemy9to5.com/tag/citibank/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ihatemy9to5.com</link>
	<description>My personal journey from hating my job to loving my life…</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 09:19:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Women in the Workplace: Is this woman &#8220;too hot&#8221; to be a banker?</title>
		<link>http://ihatemy9to5.com/2010/06/women-in-the-workplace-is-this-woman-too-hot-to-be-a-banker/</link>
		<comments>http://ihatemy9to5.com/2010/06/women-in-the-workplace-is-this-woman-too-hot-to-be-a-banker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 14:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Work Lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citibank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[too hot to be a banker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women in the workplace]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ihatemy9to5.com/?p=542978771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My work attire consists of grey cardigans, floral blouses and the occasional knee length skirt. On casual Fridays I like to be adventurous and wear jeans paired with an original (yet conservative) Urban Outfitters t-shirt. No one will ever claim my clothing is risqué...being “too hot” is not option at my 9 to 5. But [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://ihatemy9to5.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/too-hot-for-citibank.4877409.87.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><p>My work attire consists of grey cardigans, floral blouses and the occasional knee length skirt. On casual Fridays I like to be adventurous and wear jeans paired with an original (yet conservative) <a href="http://www.urbanoutfitters.com/urban/catalog/category.jsp?popId=WOMENS&amp;navAction=poppushpush&amp;isSortBy=true&amp;navCount=14&amp;pushId=W_TOPS&amp;id=W_APP_BASICTOPS" target="_blank">Urban Outfitters</a> t-shirt.</p>

<p>No one will ever claim my clothing is risqué...being “too hot” is not option at my 9 to 5. But apparently there are sexy victims in the workplace. Pencil skirts are halting productivity and male employers have no choice but to fire the trolling sexy women….<strong>YES, FIRE THEM</strong>.</p>

<p>Sultry banker <a title="Debbie Lorenzana" href="http://www.villagevoice.com/related/to/Debbie+Lorenzana" target="_blank">Debbie Lorenzana</a> is the latest victim of workplace (dress code) sexism. Citibank claims she was fired due to poor work performance, however Lorenzana says her superiors repeatedly noted they “couldn’t concentrate” in her presence. Lorenzana’s appearance was a pretty hot and tempting office distraction. The 33-year-old single mom, was ordered to stop wearing turtlenecks, pencil skirts, three-inch heels, or fitted business suits. Apparently every item in her closet caused mayhem. And understandably so…the woman is <a href="http://www.villagevoice.com/slideshow/too-hot-for-citibank--30014985/" target="_blank">stunning</a>!</p>

<p>The <a href="http://www.villagevoice.com/2010-06-01/news/is-this-woman-too-hot-to-work-in-a-bank/1" target="_blank">Village Voice</a> describes her as “<a title="Jennifer Lopez" href="http://www.villagevoice.com/related/to/Jennifer+Lopez" target="_blank">J.Lo</a> curves meets <a title="Jessica Simpson" href="http://www.villagevoice.com/related/to/Jessica+Simpson" target="_blank">Jessica Simpson</a> rack meets <a title="Audrey Hepburn" href="http://www.villagevoice.com/related/to/Audrey+Hepburn" target="_blank">Audrey Hepburn</a> elegance—a head-turning beauty.” <strong> I’m sure she could wear overalls and be <em>breathtaking. </em></strong></p>

<p>She’s now suing her former workplace, alleging that her bosses told her that “as a result of the shape of her figure, [her] clothes were purportedly ‘too distracting’ for her male colleagues and supervisors to bear.”</p>

<p><em> </em></p>

<p>I’m rooting for Lorenzana and her sexy attire. Ogling men in suits should not prevail.  If she dressed appropriately and her work performance was satisfactory she should still be a banker. No turtlenecks or pencil skirts about it.</p>

<p>Signed,</p>

<p><em>Globot</em></p>

<p>p.s. And those who object the sex kitten <a href="http://www.villagevoice.com/2010-06-01/news/is-this-woman-too-hot-to-work-in-a-bank/1" target="_blank">photos</a> on the Village Voice -- I  understand but don't care. Look through the whole slideshow and the examples of work clothes. I'm positive she wasn't prancing around the  office in lingerie. Companies shouldn't restore to firing people because of their real (or imagined) <a href="http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/archives/2010/06/the_sexy_banker.php" target="_blank">sexual allure</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ihatemy9to5.com/2010/06/women-in-the-workplace-is-this-woman-too-hot-to-be-a-banker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

